Reply To: Programming
@F6EXB_the_frenchy
Re: post #109887
Sorry, I said it did but it did not give correct answer,
I ran it 4 times with input of 100 loops
it gave integers 47%, 45%, 43% and 41%
Still not working with the alterations you gave 🙁
Thing is you do not need to use random() numbers
“err and err and err again but less and less and less” 😉
“Dam computers, I made few mistakes in life before them, dam computers!” 😉
“Good Judgment comes from Experience; Experience comes from Bad Judgment…” 😉